News

Large fine for Notting Hill landlord convicted of multiple housing offences in a licensed HMO

Thursday, February 18, 2016 - Royal Borough of Kensington & Chelsea

A property company that is the licence holder for a house in multiple occupation (HMO) in Notting Hill was fined £47,900 in relation to 24 charges under the Housing Act 2004 after Council officers found numerous breaches of regulations ranging from a faulty smoke detector to unsafe banisters. AAA London Property Limited of Warren Street London W1T had entered guilty pleas to 13 of the charges at an earlier hearing and was subsequently found guilty of the remaining 11 charges after trial.

The company’s director, Ms Jagjit Kaur, who lives in the United States of America, was fined £21,870 in relation to 16 charges under the Housing Act 2004. Ms Kaur had entered guilty pleas to nine of the charges at an earlier hearing and she was subsequently found guilty of the remaining seven charges after trial that was heard by City of London Magistrates' Court on Friday 12 February.

AAA London Property Limited and Jagjit Kaur were prosecuted by the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea in relation to offences at 14-16 Clanricarde Gardens, W2. Both were charged with failing to comply with a Prohibition Order made under the Housing Act 2004 prohibiting the use of one of the rooms as living accommodation, breaches of the HMO Management Regulations and failure to produce tenancy agreements when required to do so.

Both the company and Ms Kaur disputed the need to provide tenancy agreements to the Council citing that they would be in breach of the Data Protection Act. They also disputed that a sink in one of the rooms was blocked on the day a Council officer visited and that the smoke alarms were incorrectly installed. Ms Kaur’s defence argued that someone else was managing the property.

Magistrates heard that 14-16 Clanricarde Gardens is a six-storey HMO that had been converted into 35 lettings, in which approximately 45 tenants lived. However, the Council produced a copy of the HMO application form that confirmed that AAA London Property Limited is the licence holder and Ms Kaur is the manager with responsibility.

The court took into account the early guilty pleas by AAA London Property Limited and Ms Kaur, as well as their good character. Accordingly, the magistrates imposed a reduction to the financial penalty in relation to those specific charges.

Cllr Rock Feilding-Mellen, the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea’s Cabinet Member for Housing said:

Councils have a duty to ensure that licensed HMOs are fit for the number of occupiers. The purpose of the licensing requirements is to enable local authorities to ensure that HMOs are safe, have adequate facilities for the occupiers and are properly managed.

It is very important that, when faced with landlords who are not adhering to the appropriate regulations and licensing conditions, we take all necessary action to ensure that tenants are protected and that the properties they live in meet all legal requirements.

In this case both the company and its director failed to meet the minimum standards and their responsibilities as a landlord so I am very pleased that the court has handed down these fines.

As well as being fined AAA London Property Limited and Ms Kaur were ordered to pay the Council’s costs of £7,709.75 and both had to pay a victim surcharge of £120.

Total Landlord Insurance Advert Landlord & Letting Show 2016 Rent Square advert